IFRS Alerts

Issue 2024-05

November 2024 Hyperinflation Update

According to data in the World Economic Outlook (WEO) report issued by the International Monetary Fund (IMF) in October 2024, and based on economic conditions that currently exist, certain countries are now considered to be hyperinflationary from 31 December 2024. Therefore, reporting entities in those countries will be required to apply IAS 29 'Financial Reporting in Hyperinflationary Economies'. Consequently, any entities with interim or annual financial reporting requirements at 31 December 2024 or thereafter should reflect IAS 29 in their IFRS financial statements.

From 31 December 2024 onwards there are fifteen countries around the world where IAS 29 should be applied, when entities want to state they are in full compliance with IFRS. These countries are: Argentina, Ethiopia, Ghana, Haiti, Iran, Laos, Lebanon, Malawi, Sierra Leone, South Sudan, Suriname, Turkey, Venezuela, Yemen and Zimbabwe.

Additional considerations were made to determine if South Sudan and Ghana are still hyperinflationary. For the time being, they remain hyperinflationary but we will be keeping a close eye on further inflation data from these countries.

Egypt and Nigeria were also assessed due to high inflation numbers for the preceding three-year period. However, in both cases certain qualitative factors were considered and for now neither is considered to be hyperinflationary. A close eye should be kept on further inflation data from both of these countries.

Recapping the requirements of IAS 29
IAS 29 lists factors that indicate when an economy is hyperinflationary. One of the indicators of hyperinflation is if cumulative inflation over a three-year period approaches, or is in excess of 100 per cent. ​

The mechanics of restatement​
IAS 29 requires amounts in the statement of financial position that are not already expressed in terms of the measuring unit current at the end of the reporting period, are restated by applying a general price index. In summary:

• assets and liabilities linked by agreement to changes in prices, such as index linked bonds and loans, are adjusted in accordance with the agreement
• non-monetary items carried at current amounts at the end of the reporting period (such as net realisable value and fair value) are not restated
• all other non-monetary assets and liabilities are restated
• monetary items (ie money held and items to be received or paid in money) are not restated because they are already expressed in terms of the monetary unit currency at the end of the reporting period, and
• all items in the statement of comprehensive income should be expressed using the measuring unit current at the end of the reporting period, so all amounts need to be restated from the dates when the items of income and expenditure were originally recorded in the financial statements.​

Other important factors that should be taken into consideration when applying IAS 29
IAS 29 sets out specific requirements on how to restate prior period comparatives. It requires corresponding figures for the previous reporting period to be restated by applying a general price index so that the comparative financial statements are presented in terms of the measuring unit current at the end of the reporting period.​

IAS 29 may result in the creation of additional temporary differences under IAS 12 ‘Income Taxes’. This is because the restatement of items under IAS 29 will often lead to adjustments to the carrying amounts of items without corresponding changes to their tax bases. Be mindful that IAS 12 requires these adjustments to be recognised in profit or loss.​

Impairment testing should also not be overlooked. IAS 29 requires any restated non-monetary items to be reduced when it exceeds its recoverable amount, even if those assets were not previously considered impaired under historical cost accounting. It will be important when preparing financial statements to consider whether the restatement of asset carrying values affects the results of impairment tests that were conducted in previous reporting periods, and whether there are any indicators of impairment for assets that were not tested for impairment in previous periods.​

IFRIC decisions relating to hyperinflation​
The IFRS Interpretations Committee (IFRIC) have previously considered a number of accounting issues in relation to dealing with hyperinflation. These include:

• translating a hyperinflationary foreign operation and presenting exchange differences​
• accounting for cumulative exchange differences before a foreign operation becomes hyperinflationary
• presenting comparative amounts when a foreign operation first becomes hyperinflationary, and
• consolidation of a non-hyperinflationary subsidiary by a hyperinflationary parent.

We encourage careful consideration of these issues when preparing IFRS financial statements and applying IAS 29.​

Our thoughts
IAS 29 is not a Standard that can be quickly implemented, particularly in group situations. Careful consideration needs to be given to the IFRIC guidance dealing with situations where there is a hyperinflationary parent that has subsidiaries who also report in a hyperinflationary currency versus situations where a non-hyperinflationary parent has subsidiaries that report in a hyperinflationary currency. Also be mindful of how a hyperinflationary parent with subsidiaries that do not report in a hyperinflationary currency should be accounted for given the requirements set out in IAS 21 ‘The Effects of Changes in Foreign Exchange Rates’. ​

Any reporting entity considering IAS 29 for the first time will have to adapt their existing accounting systems to be able to process the hyperinflationary adjustments. It is important they understand the mechanics of adjusting for hyperinflation so they can restate in their financial statements both current and comparative periods.​

Issue 2024-04

IASB issues annual improvements to IFRS Accounting Standards

The International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) has published 'Annual Improvements to IFRS Accounting Standards – Volume 11' addressing non-urgent (but necessary) minor amendments to five Standards, as described below.

Background
The publication is a collection of amendments to IFRS Standards discussed by the IASB during the current project cycle for annual improvements. The IASB uses the Annual Improvements process to make necessary, but non-urgent, amendments to IFRS Standards that will not be included as part of any other project. By presenting the amendments in a single document rather than as a series of piecemeal changes, the IASB aims to ease the burden of change for all concerned. A summary of the issues addressed is set here. 

Effective date
The amendments are effective from annual reporting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2026, with early application permitted.

Our thoughts
The Annual Improvements process is an efficient way to ensure that inconsistencies and terminology within the Standards can be updated without issuing individual amendments to each standard. All the amendments made in 'Annual Improvements to IFRS Accounting Standards – Volume 11' are uncontroversial in nature, and our view is they increase clarity to the impacted Standards. 

Issue 2024-03

Amendments to the Classification and Measurement of Financial Instruments

The International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) has issued amendments to IFRS 9 ‘Financial Instruments’ and some amendments have also been made to IFRS 7 ‘Financial Instruments: Disclosures’, following a post-implementation review (PIR) of IFRS 9. The amendments also include consequential changes to IFRS 19 ‘Subsidiaries without Public Accountability: Disclosures’ to reflect the amendments made to IFRS 7.

Background
The IASB’s PIR of the classification and measurement requirements in IFRS 9 and the related requirements in IFRS 7 concluded that overall, the requirements set out in these two standards can be applied consistently and they also provide useful information to users of the financial statements. However, the PIR process did reveal some areas that could be improved and they included:

• accounting for the settlement of a financial asset or liability using an electronic payment system, and
• applying the requirements for assessing contractual cash flow characteristics to financial assets with features related to environmental, social, and governance (ESG) matters.

To address these matters and to improve clarity and understanding, the IASB has issued some amendments to the classification and measurement of financial instruments to promote consistency.

The amendments
Derecognition of financial instruments when an electronic payment system is used
New guidance has been added to IFRS 9 to specifically address when a financial liability should be derecognised when it is settled by electronic payment. Previously, an entity was required to wait until the settlement date of the transaction to discharge the liability, but the new guidance allows for the liability to be discharged before the settlement date if:

• the payment cannot be withdrawn, stopped or cancelled
• the entity no longer has the practical ability to access the cash, and
• settlement risk associated with the electronic payment system is insignificant.

Classification of financial assets
Contractual cash flows that are solely payments of principal and interest on the principal amount outstanding
IFRS 9 has always required an entity to consider the characteristics of its contractual cash flows to appropriately classify a financial asset. The amendments provide some additional guidance to help an entity assess whether the contractual cash flows of a financial asset are consistent with a basic lending arrangement. Given the importance of this determination, new guidance has been provided, including examples of contractual cash flows that are solely payments of principal and interest on the principal outstanding, to ascertain whether or not the arrangements would be consistent with a basic lending arrangement.

IFRS 9 also describes certain situations where financial assets may have contractual cash flows that are described as principal and interest, but the payments made do not actually represent a basic lending arrangement. This may be the case if a financial asset has non-recourse features. The amendments to IFRS 9 provide a clearer definition of a non-recourse feature, which is now outlined as a financial asset where the entity’s ultimate right to receive cash flows is contractually limited to the cash flows generated by specified assets.

Contractually linked instruments
IFRS 9 has also been updated to provide additional guidance to clarify the characteristics of contractually linked instruments as well as the definition of the underlying pool used to assess whether a transaction contains contractually linked instruments. The amendments also specify that transactions that contain multiple debt instruments are not automatically contracts with multiple contractually linked instruments, and so they must be carefully assessed before a final determination is made.

IFRS 7: Disclosures
Investments in equity instruments designated at fair value through other comprehensive income
The amendments to IFRS 7 add new required disclosures for any investments in equity instruments designated at fair value through other comprehensive income. These include disclosures of the fair value gain or loss presented in other comprehensive income for the period, showing separately the fair value gain or loss related to investments derecognised or held, as well as the transfer of cumulative gain or loss within equity related to derecognised investments.

Contractual terms that could change the amount of contractual cash flow based on contingent events
IFRS 7 has been amended to require additional new disclosures for each class of financial asset measured at amortised cost or fair value through other comprehensive income, as well as financial liabilities measured at amortised cost. When there are contractual terms that could change the contractual cash flows based on the outcome of a contingent event not directly related to basic lending risk, an entity must now disclose certain information surrounding the related contingent event as well as possible changes to cash flows and the gross carrying value and amortised cost of the related financial asset or liability. These new disclosures are also now reflected in IFRS 19.

Effective date
The amendments are effective from annual reporting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2026. Early adoption of the Standard is permitted, with a choice to either apply all amendments at the same time and disclose that fact or to apply only the amendments to the Application Guidance sections for the earlier period and disclose that fact.

An entity is required to apply these amendments retrospectively.  However, an entity is not required to restate prior periods to reflect the application of the amendments unless it can clearly demonstrate that hindsight has not been used to make those changes.

Our thoughts
We were pleased to see the IASB taking on board many of the comments submitted to it during the PIR process on IFRS 9 and responding to them in a timely way. One of the goals of the IASB in making these amendments was to reduce diversity in practice, and we believe this will happen.

The guidance set out in these amendments for preparers on the derecognition of financial liabilities settled through electronic transfer will be helpful. So will the amendments clarifying how to assess the contractual cash flows characteristics of financial assets when ESG-linked features are present, when non-recourse features exist and when contractually linked arrangements are in place. For investors the additional disclosure requirements now reflected in IFRS 7, to deal with both financial equity investments designated at fair value through other comprehensive income and financial instruments with contractual terms that could change the timing or amount of contractual cash flows on the occurrence (or non-occurrence) of a contingent event, will be insightful.  

Issue 2024-02

IFRS 19 – Simplifying financial reporting for eligible subsidiaries

Following last month’s release of IFRS 18 ‘Presentation and Disclosure in Financial Statements’, the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) has published another new standard — IFRS 19 ‘Subsidiaries without Public Accountability: Disclosures’ (the Standard). The new Standard creates a reduced set of disclosures that certain in-scope entities can elect to apply instead of the disclosure requirements set out in other IFRS. IFRS 19 will work alongside other IFRS, with eligible subsidiaries applying the measurement, recognition and presentation requirements set out in other IFRS and the revised disclosures outlined in IFRS 19.

The objective of the Standard is to alleviate the reporting burden for subsidiaries without public accountability.

Background
The release of the Standard is the final stage of the ‘Disclosure Initiative – Targeted Standards-level Review of Disclosures’ project, which came about due to subsidiaries struggling to meet the requirements for reporting information to their parent entity to be used in consolidated financial statements. When reporting to a parent that applies full IFRS, subsidiaries must apply the recognition and measurement requirements in IFRS. This creates difficult circumstances for entities that qualify to apply IFRS for Small and Medium-Sized Entities (SMEs) for their standalone reporting.

IFRS for SMEs has fewer disclosure requirements than full application of IFRS; however, the recognition and measurement requirements differ to those of full IFRS. As a result, some subsidiaries choose not to take advantage of the reduced disclosures for IFRS for SMEs as it results in additional accounting to agree information reported to the parent entity with full IFRS recognition and measurement principles.

This new Standard aims to create a more attractive option for subsidiaries without public accountability. Eligible entities will now be able to elect to apply IFRS 19, which has the same recognition, measurement, and presentation principles as full IFRS, but allows for specific reduced disclosures in most topic areas.

The IASB believes IFRS 19 will provide a solution that will alleviate the reporting burden for in-scope entities.

Scope
In order to apply IFRS 19, an entity must meet all of the following criteria at the end of its reporting period:

• is a subsidiary
• does not have public accountability, and
• has a parent that produces consolidated financial statements available for public use that comply with full application of IFRS.

For purposes of applying IFRS 19, an entity has public accountability if:

• it has debt or equity instruments that are traded on a public market or is in the process of issuing such instruments, or
• holds assets in a fiduciary capacity for a broad group of outsiders as one of its primary business activities.

Disclosure requirements
IFRS 19 includes reduced disclosures for almost all existing IFRS, the details of which are specific to each impacted standard. To apply IFRS 19, entities will first apply the recognition, measurement, and presentation requirements in each applicable IFRS. The entity will then not apply the disclosure requirements in the applicable IFRS but will instead refer to IFRS 19 for required disclosures.

Standards with no reduced disclosures
The IASB assessed each individual standard to determine whether to reduce disclosures and how best to do so while still meeting the fair presentation requirements and investor needs. The following standards do not have reduced disclosure requirements under IFRS 19 and the disclosures set out in each standard still apply:

• IAS 33 ‘Earnings per Share’
• IFRS 8 ‘Operating Segments’
• IFRS 17 ‘Insurance Contracts’

Subsidiaries that are eligible to apply IFRS 19 are not required to apply IAS 33 or IFRS 8 but may do so voluntarily. If either are applied, the full disclosures required by IAS 33 or IFRS 8 will apply.

Maintenance of IFRS 19
Due to the nature of IFRS 19, it will need to be amended whenever there are any new or amended disclosure requirements in other IFRS. To ensure that IFRS 19 is always up to date, any proposed amendments to IFRS 19 will be included in an exposure draft for the corresponding new or amended IFRS.

Effective date of IFRS 19
The Standard is effective from annual reporting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2027, allowing eligible reporting entities and their auditors time to assess whether electing to apply IFRS 19 would benefit them. Early adoption of the Standard is permitted. It is important to note that if an entity applies IFRS 19 in the current period but not in the period immediately preceding, comparative prior period information is required to be provided for amounts reported in the current period financial statements.

Our thoughts
We support the release of this new Standard, which should reduce the cost of preparing financial statements for eligible subsidiaries while maintaining the usefulness of the presented information.

While the effective date is a while away, we would encourage entities to consider whether they are eligible and to assess whether applying IFRS 19 would reduce their reporting burden. We have plans to release an article later in the year that will provide a more detailed look at the requirements of this Standard.

Issue 2024-01

Introducing IFRS 18 – The IASB’s new presentation and disclosure standard

On 9 April 2024 the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) published a new standard, its first since 2017. The new standard, IFRS 18 ‘Presentation and Disclosure in Financial Statements’ (the Standard) replaces IAS 1 ‘Presentation of Financial Statements’ and will impact every reporting entity that currently uses International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS).

The objective of the Standard is to improve how information is communicated in an entity’s financial statements, particularly in the statement of profit or loss and in its notes to the financial statements.

Key changes

• Changes to presentation requirements in the statement of profit or loss
• Foreign exchange differences
• Entities with specified main business activities
• New requirements to be included in the notes to the financial statements
• Management-defined performance measures
• Updated guidance for the aggregation and disaggregation of information
• Changes to how expenses in the operating category are presented
• Consequential changes made to other standards

Background
The release of the Standard is the final stage of the Primary Financial Statements project, which came about due to the lack of detailed requirements in IAS 1 for the following areas:

• the classification of income and expenses in the statement of profit or loss
• the presentation of subtotals in the statement of profit or loss, and
• the aggregation and disaggregation of information presented in the primary financial statements or disclosed in the notes.

This led to diversity in practice as entities defined their own subtotals and performance measures, which made comparison of financial performance between entities difficult for investors.

The IASB believes IFRS 18 will resolve these issues and improve the overall quality of financial reporting.

The key changes in the new Standard
Overall, the majority of changes made in IFRS 18 impact the statement of profit or loss and notes to the financial statements, but there are also limited changes to specific requirements that are set out in IAS 7 ‘Statement of Cash Flows’. Only minimal changes were made to the disclosures required for the statement presenting comprehensive income, the statement of changes in equity and the statement of financial position. While much has been carried forward from IAS 1, there are some key changes that reporting entities need to be aware of.

Changes to presentation requirements in the statement of profit or loss
The main change introduced by IFRS 18 is to the way in which reporting entities will structure their statement of profit or loss. 

Firstly, the Standard introduces two new defined subtotals:

• Operating profit, and
• Profit before financing and income taxes.

These new required subtotals are intended to increase comparability by ensuring that information presented for investors is consistent across different entities.

Additionally, the Standard requires an entity to classify all income and expenses into one of the following five categories:

• operating
• investing
• financing
• income taxes, and
• discontinued operations.

The investing category includes income and expenses from investments in associates, joint ventures and unconsolidated subsidiaries, cash and cash equivalents, and any other assets (such as cash and cash equivalents) that generate returns separately from the entity’s other resources.

The financing category distinguishes between transactions that are solely for the purpose of raising finance, and those that are not. Income and expenses from all liabilities that result solely from the raising of finance are included in this category, along with some elements of interest income or expense recognised by applying other IFRS. This category, together with the subtotal for profit before financing and income taxes enables investors to assess the reporting entity’s performance before the effects of its financing.

The income taxes and discontinued operations categories include income and expenses resulting from the application of IAS 12 ‘Income taxes’ and any related foreign exchange differences, and IFRS 5 ‘Non-current assets held for sale and discontinued operations’ respectively.

Finally, the operating category includes all other items of income and expense that are not allocated to one of the other four categories. It is a default category, so it is important to note this category will include income and expenses from an entity’s main business activities, regardless of whether the income or expenses are volatile or unusual. The operating profit subtotal provides not only a measure of past performance, but also a starting point for forecasting an entity’s future cash flows.

Foreign exchange differences
IFRS 18 requires foreign exchange differences to be classified in the same category of the statement of profit or loss as the income and expenses from items that gave rise to the foreign exchange differences. This means, for example, that foreign exchange differences on bank loans would be classified in the financing category. However, if classifying foreign exchange differences this way would involve undue cost or effort, an entity is permitted to classify them in the operating category. Careful attention should be given to specific requirements for classifying income and expenses from hybrid contracts and fair value gains and losses on derivatives.

Entities with specified main business activities
While the above applies to most entities, it is complicated for reporting entities such as investment firms, financial institutions and insurers where their main business activities (for which income and expenses would usually be classified in the operating category), would fall into the definition of investing or financing activities.

When a reporting entity has assessed that it invests in assets as its main business activity, income and expenses are split between the investing category and operating category, depending on how the underlying assets are accounted for. For all assets accounted for using the equity method, income and expenses are included in the investing category, and for all other assets income and expenses are included in the operating category.

When a reporting entity has assessed that it provides financing to customers as its main business activity, it will classify income and expenses from liabilities relating to providing such finance in the operating category.

The assessment of an entity’s main business activities is therefore going to be a key judgement which may significantly impact the geography of where items appear in the statement of profit or loss. This is likely to prove particularly challenging for mixed groups and groups of reporting entities which provide multiple services.

New requirements to be included in the notes to the financial statements
The Standard also introduces new disclosures, in addition to those carried forward from IAS 1, to supplement the primary financial statements. They are:

• Management-defined performance measures, and
• Specified expenses by nature.

Management-defined performance measures
In order to address the significant diversity in practice currently seen when it comes to so-called ‘alternative performance measures’ and any non-GAAP performance measures, IFRS 18 introduces the concept of a ‘management-defined performance measure’ (MPM).

MPMs are subtotals of income and expenses other than those listed by IFRS 18 or specifically required by another IFRS, that an entity uses:

• in public communications outside financial statements, and/or
• to communicate to users of financial statements management’s view of an aspect of the financial performance of the entity as a whole.

Alongside any MPMs that are disclosed, a reporting entity will also be required to disclose information including:

• a reconciliation between the MPM and the most directly comparable IFRS 18 subtotal, total or subtotal required by another IFRS
• a description of how the MPM communicates management’s view and how it is calculated
• an explanation of changes to the MPMs disclosed or to how any of the measures are calculated, and
• a statement indicating that measures used reflect management’s view of the financial performance of the entity as a whole and indicates that the measure may not always be directly comparable to any measures sharing similar labels and descriptions provided by other reporting entities.

These disclosures will be required for any measure that meets the definition of a MPM and when applicable and they must be included in a single note in the reporting entity’s financial statements.

Updated guidance for the aggregation and disaggregation of information
The Standard provides specific guidance to ensure that aggregation and disaggregation in the financial statements is consistent and provides investors with the information they need for analysis. The basic principles set out in IFRS 18 require entities to:

• aggregate or disaggregate items based on whether they share similar characteristics or have different characteristics
• ensure that the method of grouping items does not obscure material information or reduce understanding, and
• apply aggregation or disaggregation based on characteristics in both in the primary financial statements and the notes to the financial statements.

Changes to how expenses in the operating category are presented
Consistent with IAS 1, IFRS 18 requires an entity to present in a structured and meaningful way its operating expenses based either on their nature or their function. This means some entities might decide to classify some expenses by nature and other expenses by function. The Standard requires entities that present expenses classified by function to disclose the amount of depreciation, amortisation, employee benefits, impairment losses and write-down of inventories included in each line in the operating category of the statement of profit or loss.

Consequential changes made to other standards
Consequential changes have been made to the standard on cash flow statements. IAS 7 now requires entities to use the operating profit total as defined in IFRS 18 as the starting point for reporting cash flows from operating activities using the indirect method. In addition, the interest and dividend presentation alternatives that previously existed have also been removed to simplify practice and reduce diversity in preparation.

Elsewhere, IAS 33 ‘Earnings per Share’ (EPS) requirements have been amended to permit an entity to disclose additional EPS information over and above reporting basic and diluted EPS amounts. However, additional amounts can only be included in the EPS calculation if the numerator is either a total or subtotal identified in IFRS 18 or a MPM. IAS 34 ‘Interim Financial Reporting’ has also been updated to require disclosure of information about MPMs in interim financial statements and guidance is now provided on how subtotals should be dealt with in interim financial statements.

Effective date of IFRS 18
The Standard is effective from annual reporting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2027, allowing reporting entities and their auditors time to properly prepare for the transition to IFRS 18. Early adoption of the Standard is permitted. It is important to note, IFRS 18 must be applied retrospectively, so restatement of all comparative information is required when the Standard is adopted. 

Our thoughts
We support the release of this new Standard, which should improve the overall quality of financial reporting and enable better comparison of financial statements by investors. 

While the effective date is a while away, we would encourage entities to start considering the impact sooner rather than later. To assist with this, we have plans to release a ‘Getting ready for IFRS 18’ guide later in the year that will provide a more detailed look at the requirements of this Standard, and the likely impact on reporting entities. 

Issue 2023-05

December 2023 Hyperinflation update
According to the World Economic Outlook (WEO) report issued by the International Monetary Fund (IMF) in October 2023, and based on economic conditions that currently exist in Ghana, Sierra Leone and Haiti, these countries are now considered to be hyperinflationary from 31 December 2023. Therefore, reporting entities in those countries will be required to apply IAS 29 ‘Financial Reporting in Hyperinflationary Economies’. Consequently, any entities from those countries with interim or annual reporting requirements at 31 December 2023 or thereafter should reflect IAS 29 in their IFRS financial statements.

The WEO report also identifies that South Sudan might no longer be a hyperinflationary economy from 31 December 2023. 

From 31 December 2023 onwards there are thirteen countries around the world where IAS 29 should be applied, when entities want to state they are in full compliance with IFRS. These countries are: Argentina, Ethiopia, Ghana, Haiti, Iran, Lebanon, Sierra Leone, Sudan, Suriname, Turkey, Venezuela, Yemen (which should be closely monitored) and Zimbabwe. 

Recapping the requirements of IAS 29
IAS 29 requires the financial statements of any entity whose functional currency is the currency of a hyperinflationary economy to be restated for changes in the general purchasing power of that currency, so that the financial information provided is more meaningful.

Indicators of hyperinflation
IAS 29 lists factors that indicate when an economy is hyperinflationary. One of the indicators of hyperinflation is if cumulative inflation over a three-year period approaches, or is in excess of 100 per cent. 

The mechanics of restatement
IAS 29 requires amounts in the statement of financial position that are not already expressed in terms of the measuring unit current at the end of the reporting period, are restated by applying a general price index. In summary:

• assets and liabilities linked by agreement to changes in prices, such as index linked bonds and loans, are adjusted in accordance with the agreement;
• non-monetary items carried at current amounts at the end of the reporting period (such as net realisable value and fair value) are not restated;
• all other non-monetary assets and liabilities are restated;
• monetary items (ie money held and items to be received or paid in money) are not restated because they are already expressed in terms of the monetary unit currency at the end of the reporting period; and
• all items in the statement of comprehensive income should be expressed using the measuring unit current at the end of the reporting period, so all amounts need to be restated from the dates when the items of income and expenditure were originally recorded in the financial statements.

Other important factors that should be taken into consideration when applying IAS 29
IAS 29 sets out specific requirements on how to restate prior period comparatives. It requires corresponding figures for the previous reporting period to be restated by applying a general price index so that the comparative financial statements are presented in terms of the measuring unit current at the end of the reporting period.

IAS 29 may result in the creation of additional temporary differences under IAS 12 ‘Income Taxes’. This is because the restatement of items under IAS 29 will often lead to adjustments to the carrying amounts of items without corresponding changes to their tax bases. Be mindful that IAS 12 requires these adjustments to be recognised in profit or loss.

Impairment testing should also not be overlooked. IAS 29 requires any restated non-monetary items to be reduced when it exceeds its recoverable amount, even if those assets were not previously considered impaired under historical cost accounting. It will be important when preparing financial statements to consider whether the restatement of asset carrying values affects the results of impairment tests that were conducted in previous reporting periods, and whether there are any indicators of impairment for assets that were not tested for impairment in previous periods.

IFRIC decisions relating to hyperinflation
The IFRS Interpretations Committee (IFRIC) have previously considered a number of accounting issues in relation to dealing with hyperinflation. These include:

• translating a hyperinflationary foreign operation and presenting exchange differences;
• accounting for cumulative exchange differences before a foreign operation becomes hyperinflationary;
• presenting comparative amounts when a foreign operation first comes hyperinflationary; and
• consolidation of a non-hyperinflationary subsidiary by a hyperinflationary parent.

We encourage careful consideration of these issues when preparing IFRS financial statements and applying IAS 29.

Our thoughts
IAS 29 is not a Standard that can be quickly implemented, particularly in group situations. Careful consideration needs to be given to the IFRIC guidance dealing with situations where there is a hyperinflationary parent that has subsidiaries who also report in a hyperinflationary currency versus situations where a non-hyperinflationary parent has subsidiaries that report in a hyperinflationary currency. Also be mindful of how a hyperinflationary parent with subsidiaries that do not report in a hyperinflationary currency should be accounted for given the requirements set out in IAS 21 ‘The Effects of Changes in Foreign Exchange Rates’. 

Any reporting entity considering IAS 29 for the first time will have to adapt their existing accounting systems to be able to process the hyperinflationary adjustments. It is important they understand the mechanics of adjusting for hyperinflation so they can restate in their financial statements both current and comparative periods.

Issue 2023-04

IASB issues amendments to the IFRS for SMEs to help entities respond to the Pillar Two tax rules

The International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) has amended the IFRS for SMEs. The amendments, entitled ‘International Tax Reform—Pillar Two Model (Amendments to the IFRS for SMEs)’ are based on the amendments to IAS 12 ‘Income Taxes’ issued in May 2023, and address the impacts of the introduction of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development’s (OECD) Pillar Two Model Rules. The amendments introduce a temporary exception and targeted disclosure requirements.

Background
The OECD published its Pillar Two Model Rules in December 2021 to ensure that large multinational companies (i.e. groups with revenue of EUR750 million or more in two of the last four years) would be subject to a minimum 15% tax rate. The reform is expected to apply in most jurisdictions for accounting periods starting on or after 1 January 2024.

However, while the reaction from jurisdictions around the world to implement the changes has been positive, there have been major stakeholder concerns about the uncertainty over the accounting for deferred taxes arising from the implementation of these rules. Those concerns mainly refer to identifying and measuring deferred taxes, because determining whether the Pillar Two Model Rules will create additional temporary differences is very difficult, and also which tax rate will be applicable (considering the number of factors affecting its determination).

Following similar amendments to IAS 12 ‘Income Taxes’, issued in May 2023, the IASB has issued these ‘out-of-cycle’ amendments to the IFRS for SMEs to provide direction on what they expect entities to disclose.

The amendments

• Introduce a temporary recognition exception for entities applying the IFRS for SMEs from recognising deferred tax assets and liabilities arising from Pillar Two Model Rules, and from the related disclosures on deferred tax assets and liabilities that would otherwise be required.
• Provide clarification on the disclosures required by entities applying the IFRS for SMEs. This includes disclosing the current tax expense/income arising from Pillar Two Model Rules, and a statement that it has applied the exemption from recognising deferred tax balances relating to Pillar Two Model Rules.

Entities can benefit from this temporary exception immediately and are required to provide the disclosures set out in the amendments for reporting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2023.

Our thoughts 
As with the previous amendments to IAS 12, we welcome these amendments because many of our clients around the world have indicated they are concerned at the amount of time, cost and effort that will be required to assess the accounting implications associated with the tax consequences arising from the implementation of the Pillar Two Model Rules.

Similarly, we commend the IASB for moving quickly to extend the guidance and relief to entities who report under the IFRS for SMEs, as they too face uncertainty due to the Pillar Two Model Rules.

Issue 2023-03

Lack of exchangeability

The International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) has amended IAS 21 ‘The Effects of Changes in Foreign Exchange Rates’ to clarify the approach that should be taken by preparers of financial statements when they are reporting foreign currency transactions, translating foreign operations, or presenting financial statements in a different currency, and there is a long-term lack of exchangeability between the relevant currencies.

The amendments
The amendments include both updates to guidance to assist preparers in correctly accounting for foreign currency items and increases the level of disclosure required to help users understand the impact of a lack of exchangeability on the financial statements. The amendments:

• introduce a definition of whether a currency is exchangeable, and the process by which an entity should assess this exchangeability. This includes application guidance included in a new Appendix A
• provide guidance on how an entity should estimate a spot exchange rate in cases where a currency is not exchangeable
• require additional disclosures in cases where an entity has estimated a spot exchange rate due to a lack of exchangeability, including the nature and financial impact of the lack of exchangeability, and details of the spot exchange rate used and the estimation process.

The additional disclosure requirements provide useful information about the additional level of estimation uncertainty, and risks arising for the entity due to the lack of exchangeability.

The amendments to IAS 21 are effective for accounting periods on or after 1 January 2025, with earlier application permitted.

Our thoughts
Until now IAS 21 included guidance on the exchange rate to be used when exchangeability between two currencies was temporarily lacking but was silent on the approach to be taken when a lack of exchangeability was not temporary. Although lack of exchangeability may occur relatively infrequently, in such cases economic conditions can often deteriorate quickly. Diversity in applying existing IAS 21 guidance may therefore lead to material differences in how events and transactions are reported. These amendments provide guidance that will increase comparability between financial statements and provide more useful information to users.

Issue 2023-02

IASB issues amendments to enhance the transparency of supplier finance arrangements

The International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) has amended IAS 7 ‘Cash flow Statements’ and IFRS 7 ‘Financial Instruments: Disclosures’ through the increase of disclosure requirements to enhance the transparency of supplier finance arrangements and their effects on an entity’s liabilities, cash flows and exposure to liquidity risk.

The amendments require additional disclosures that complement the existing disclosures in these two Standards. They require entities to disclose:

• the terms and conditions of the arrangement
• the amount of the liabilities that are part of the arrangements, breaking out the amounts for which the suppliers have already received payment from the finance providers, and stating where the liabilities are included on the statement of financial position
• ranges of payment due dates
• liquidity risk information.

These additional disclosure requirements address investors wanting more visibility around supplier finance arrangements, which in some jurisdictions around the world are better known are reverse factoring arrangements.

The amendments to IAS 7 and IFRS 7 are effective for accounting periods on or after 1 January 2024.

Our thoughts 
We welcome these amendments. In jurisdictions where supplier financing arrangements are common, we acknowledge there is a need to explain to the users of financial statements what the effects of such arrangements are on an entity’s liabilities and its cash flows. These amendments will provide the visibility investors require on such arrangements because the disclosures made could impact their assessment of debt covenant arrangements and leverage ratios.

Issue 2023-01

IASB amends IAS 12 to help entities respond to the 'Pillar Two' tax rules 

The International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) has issued amendments to IAS 12 ‘Income taxes’ to give entities temporary relief from accounting for deferred taxes arising from the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development’s (OECD) international tax reform. The amendments introduce both a temporary exception and some targeted disclosure requirements.

Background
The OECD published its Pillar Two Model Rules in December 2021 to ensure that large multinational companies (ie groups with revenue of EUR750 million or more in two of the last four years) would be subject to a minimum 15% tax rate. The reform is expected to apply in most jurisdictions for accounting periods starting on or after 1 January 2024.

However, while the reaction from jurisdictions around the world to implement the changes has been positive, there have been major stakeholder concerns about the uncertainty over the accounting for deferred taxes arising from the implementation of these rules. Those concerns mainly refer to identifying and measuring deferred taxes because determining whether the Pillar Two Rules will create additional temporary differences is very difficult and also which tax rate will be applicable (considering the number of factors affecting its determination). Therefore, the IASB has acted quickly to address these concerns and provide direction on what they expect entities to disclose.

The amendments:

• Provide a temporary recognition exception to accounting for deferred taxes arising from the implementation of the international tax reform (Pillar Two Model Rules). The aim of this exception is to provide some consistency in applying IAS 12 when preparing financial statements as the rules are phased in.
• Additional disclosure requirements – these are targeted at a reporting entity’s exposure to income taxes arising from the OECD reforms in periods in which the Pillar Two Model legislation is enacted or substantively enacted but not yet in effect. The aim of these disclosures is to help investors with their understanding of the reporting entity’s exposure to these tax reforms, particularly before any domestic offshore legislation takes effect. The amendments provide guidance on how this information could be disclosed to meet the above objective.

Entities are able to benefit from the temporary exception immediately as soon as the amendments are published but in providing this exemption they are required to provide the disclosures to investors for annual reporting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2023.  However, in some jurisdictions, such as Europe, the endorsement process will probably not be completed before 30 June 2023 resulting in reporting entities operating in jurisdictions where the Pillar Two Rules have been enacted or quasi enacted, being in a situation that the amendments are aiming to avoid.

We are of the view that if this happens, reporting entities are able to develop their own accounting policy in accordance with the guidance of Paragraph 10 of IAS 8 ‘Accounting Policies, Changes in Accounting Estimates and Errors’. We consider that the value of the information being provided (ie relevancy, reliability, faithful presentation) is outweighed by the costs of attempting to update the deferred tax balances for Pillar Two Model Rules.

Put another way, given these amendments to IAS 12 make it clear that no deferred tax is required to be recognised as a result of Pillar Two Model Rules, trying to identify and estimate any deferred tax for one period (i) in a way that might not be consistent with how other reporting entities would do it and (ii) with the only perspective to reverse it in a following period, may not end up providing reliable, consistent and decision useful information for the users of the financial statements. 

Our thoughts
We welcome these amendments because many of our clients around the world have indicated they are concerned at the amount of time, cost and effort that will be required to assess the accounting implications associated with the tax consequences arising from the implementation of the Pillar Two Model Rules.

Considering some jurisdictions around the world have already substantially enacted the Pillar Two Model Rules, we commend the IASB for the speed in which they published these amendments and encourage reporting entities to consider what new disclosures are now required well ahead of any reporting obligations they might have. Listed entities in particular should take into account any views expressed by their local regulator in developing their accounting policy on this matter.